<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Barack Obama isn&#8217;t the Antichrist and why he&#8217;ll get re-elected in 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elnu.com/2010/04/18/why-barack-obama-isnt-the-antichrist-and-why-hell-get-re-elected-in-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elnu.com/2010/04/18/why-barack-obama-isnt-the-antichrist-and-why-hell-get-re-elected-in-2012/</link>
	<description>Introducing Elemental Numerology - the truth revealed!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:52:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vera</title>
		<link>http://www.elnu.com/2010/04/18/why-barack-obama-isnt-the-antichrist-and-why-hell-get-re-elected-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Vera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elnu.com/?p=24#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Archie, let me express my gratitute to your wonderful work, knowledge and intelect. I don&#039;t believe President Obama will give up leadership in 2012. His exceptional human nature doesn&#039;t allow him to let America fall. I wish he is re-elected and so have enough time to bring his beautiful but demanding ideas to fruition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Archie, let me express my gratitute to your wonderful work, knowledge and intelect. I don&#8217;t believe President Obama will give up leadership in 2012. His exceptional human nature doesn&#8217;t allow him to let America fall. I wish he is re-elected and so have enough time to bring his beautiful but demanding ideas to fruition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://www.elnu.com/2010/04/18/why-barack-obama-isnt-the-antichrist-and-why-hell-get-re-elected-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 03:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elnu.com/?p=24#comment-40</guid>
		<description>I was looking something up and was interested to see numerology as #18 on google trends in the USA today. I would not have suspected!

    
   
 Tip: Use commas to compare multiple search terms.  

 
 
 Hot Searches  (USA) 

May 19, 2010 -  change date 
Updated 35 minutes ago

     iGoogle Gadget  New!        Site Feed  
 
1. travis garland 
2. weiner facts 
3. cool texas 
4. how old is justin bieber 
5. sammy sosa 
 6. homeward bound 
7. casey james mugshot 
8. megan fox transformers 3 
9. michael bay 
10. bret michaels on oprah 
 11. the good guys tv show 
12. rand paul civil rights act 
13. call of duty black ops weapons 
14. jason david frank 
15. face reading 
 16. coach carter 
17. lee dewyze hallelujah video 
18. numerology 
19. i get that a lot 
20. american idol finale 
 
Google Trends provides insights into broad search patterns. Please keep in mind that several approximations are used when computing these results.
 
 
©2008 Google - Discuss - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking something up and was interested to see numerology as #18 on google trends in the USA today. I would not have suspected!</p>
<p> Tip: Use commas to compare multiple search terms.  </p>
<p> Hot Searches  (USA) </p>
<p>May 19, 2010 &#8211;  change date<br />
Updated 35 minutes ago</p>
<p>     iGoogle Gadget  New!        Site Feed  </p>
<p>1. travis garland<br />
2. weiner facts<br />
3. cool texas<br />
4. how old is justin bieber<br />
5. sammy sosa<br />
 6. homeward bound<br />
7. casey james mugshot<br />
8. megan fox transformers 3<br />
9. michael bay<br />
10. bret michaels on oprah<br />
 11. the good guys tv show<br />
12. rand paul civil rights act<br />
13. call of duty black ops weapons<br />
14. jason david frank<br />
15. face reading<br />
 16. coach carter<br />
17. lee dewyze hallelujah video<br />
18. numerology<br />
19. i get that a lot<br />
20. american idol finale </p>
<p>Google Trends provides insights into broad search patterns. Please keep in mind that several approximations are used when computing these results.</p>
<p>©2008 Google &#8211; Discuss &#8211; Terms of Use &#8211; Privacy Policy &#8211; Help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.elnu.com/2010/04/18/why-barack-obama-isnt-the-antichrist-and-why-hell-get-re-elected-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 12:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elnu.com/?p=24#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Paul

Since Obama&#039;s forenames are Arabic, rather than Hebrew or Greek, surely it would make more sense to analyse them using the Arabic &#039;Abjad&#039; system of numerology - rather than the Hebrew or Greek Gematria? And if we do so, it&#039;s worth pointing out here that in Arabic &#039;Barak&#039; - meaning &#039;Blessed&#039; - ends with a kaf (value 20) rather than a qaf (value 100). Barak itself thus has the value of 222 (ba = 2, ray = 200, kaf = 20) which some might see as a spooky sign that the President amounts to a third of the beast of Revelation. But since the Arabic root ba-ra-ka is identical with the root of the Hebrew word &#039;baruch&#039; - which is the most common word for blessing in the Hebrew Bible -  only a highly imaginative conspiracy theorist could turn it into anything sinister!

Using the Abjad system, Barak Hussein Obama gives:
Barak (ba - ray - kaf) = 222
Hussein (ha - sin - ya - nun) = 128
Obama (ayn - ba - alef - mim) = 113

which totalled together is 463 - short of 666 by a pretty long chalk. If one wants to try to tease a message out of this, it can be recombined as the word تسج - which gives the (barely meaningful, in this context) &#039;recorded&#039; - or the arguably more interesting سجت - which means &#039;embodying&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul</p>
<p>Since Obama&#8217;s forenames are Arabic, rather than Hebrew or Greek, surely it would make more sense to analyse them using the Arabic &#8216;Abjad&#8217; system of numerology &#8211; rather than the Hebrew or Greek Gematria? And if we do so, it&#8217;s worth pointing out here that in Arabic &#8216;Barak&#8217; &#8211; meaning &#8216;Blessed&#8217; &#8211; ends with a kaf (value 20) rather than a qaf (value 100). Barak itself thus has the value of 222 (ba = 2, ray = 200, kaf = 20) which some might see as a spooky sign that the President amounts to a third of the beast of Revelation. But since the Arabic root ba-ra-ka is identical with the root of the Hebrew word &#8216;baruch&#8217; &#8211; which is the most common word for blessing in the Hebrew Bible &#8211;  only a highly imaginative conspiracy theorist could turn it into anything sinister!</p>
<p>Using the Abjad system, Barak Hussein Obama gives:<br />
Barak (ba &#8211; ray &#8211; kaf) = 222<br />
Hussein (ha &#8211; sin &#8211; ya &#8211; nun) = 128<br />
Obama (ayn &#8211; ba &#8211; alef &#8211; mim) = 113</p>
<p>which totalled together is 463 &#8211; short of 666 by a pretty long chalk. If one wants to try to tease a message out of this, it can be recombined as the word تسج &#8211; which gives the (barely meaningful, in this context) &#8216;recorded&#8217; &#8211; or the arguably more interesting سجت &#8211; which means &#8216;embodying&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie Dunlop</title>
		<link>http://www.elnu.com/2010/04/18/why-barack-obama-isnt-the-antichrist-and-why-hell-get-re-elected-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Archie Dunlop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elnu.com/?p=24#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Paul,

Of course, and there&#039;s certainly an argument for using Greek rather than Hebrew numerology.  I&#039;ll be writing a p0st about that soon.  But I must emphasise, that I was using the Book of Revelations as an example, and rightly or wrongly, people have used Hebrew numerology to associate the Emperor Nero with the number 666.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>Of course, and there&#8217;s certainly an argument for using Greek rather than Hebrew numerology.  I&#8217;ll be writing a p0st about that soon.  But I must emphasise, that I was using the Book of Revelations as an example, and rightly or wrongly, people have used Hebrew numerology to associate the Emperor Nero with the number 666.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.elnu.com/2010/04/18/why-barack-obama-isnt-the-antichrist-and-why-hell-get-re-elected-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elnu.com/?p=24#comment-21</guid>
		<description>the new testament was writen in greek anyway most people in the roman empire spoke it and all the existing scriptures are writen in greek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the new testament was writen in greek anyway most people in the roman empire spoke it and all the existing scriptures are writen in greek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie Dunlop</title>
		<link>http://www.elnu.com/2010/04/18/why-barack-obama-isnt-the-antichrist-and-why-hell-get-re-elected-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Archie Dunlop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elnu.com/?p=24#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Paul,

Thanks for the comment.  There are many different interpretations of the Book of Revelations, and even if Obama&#039;s name did add up to 666, that would not necessarily make him the anti-Christ.  And the very fact that so far his presidency has been relatively unimpressive, suggests that he isn&#039;t the Antichrist.  The doting crowds have fallen away, not something you would expected if he was the Antichrist.  Though actually, the main point of my article was to illustrate Gematria, and I&#039;m not too bothered by the theology underlying the Book of Revelations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.  There are many different interpretations of the Book of Revelations, and even if Obama&#8217;s name did add up to 666, that would not necessarily make him the anti-Christ.  And the very fact that so far his presidency has been relatively unimpressive, suggests that he isn&#8217;t the Antichrist.  The doting crowds have fallen away, not something you would expected if he was the Antichrist.  Though actually, the main point of my article was to illustrate Gematria, and I&#8217;m not too bothered by the theology underlying the Book of Revelations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.elnu.com/2010/04/18/why-barack-obama-isnt-the-antichrist-and-why-hell-get-re-elected-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elnu.com/?p=24#comment-19</guid>
		<description>the bible states that 666 is a mark on your right arm or forehead and that you will not be able to buy or sell anything without it. To suggest the antichrists name has to be add up to 666 is stupid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the bible states that 666 is a mark on your right arm or forehead and that you will not be able to buy or sell anything without it. To suggest the antichrists name has to be add up to 666 is stupid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie Dunlop</title>
		<link>http://www.elnu.com/2010/04/18/why-barack-obama-isnt-the-antichrist-and-why-hell-get-re-elected-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Archie Dunlop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elnu.com/?p=24#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Maria,

Did you read my last sentence:

&#039;Assuming, of course, that he decides to stand.&#039;

?

I actually I too don&#039;t think he will stand for re-election, perhaps because he thinks he&#039;ll lose.  Or because he&#039;s too &#039;cool&#039;.  However if he does stand for re-election in 2012, then I believe he will win.

I understand the title of my post is misleading - I wanted to make it reasonably short and snappy.  What I really wanted to say was &#039;&lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; get re-elected&#039;, but that doesn&#039;t sound so good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maria,</p>
<p>Did you read my last sentence:</p>
<p>&#8216;Assuming, of course, that he decides to stand.&#8217;</p>
<p>?</p>
<p>I actually I too don&#8217;t think he will stand for re-election, perhaps because he thinks he&#8217;ll lose.  Or because he&#8217;s too &#8216;cool&#8217;.  However if he does stand for re-election in 2012, then I believe he will win.</p>
<p>I understand the title of my post is misleading &#8211; I wanted to make it reasonably short and snappy.  What I really wanted to say was &#8216;<i>can</i> get re-elected&#8217;, but that doesn&#8217;t sound so good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.elnu.com/2010/04/18/why-barack-obama-isnt-the-antichrist-and-why-hell-get-re-elected-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elnu.com/?p=24#comment-16</guid>
		<description>This is a different view of the 2012 election...another astrologer writes that he will definitely not seek re-election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a different view of the 2012 election&#8230;another astrologer writes that he will definitely not seek re-election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

